Choose the kind of achievement

A Tap Tap Go challenge needs a scoring system that matches its particular purpose. An organiser could recognise total participation, improvement or completion of a useful journey. These are different objectives. State the selected one before presenting a comparison as a measure of team quality.

Make the denominator visible

If teams differ in size or available opportunities, raw activity totals need context. A programme might use a defined per-person measure or separate categories, but those mechanics must be expressly established rather than assumed. Explain who is included and what happens when membership changes during the challenge.

Keep quality beside activity

Check whether the challenge encourages meaningful profile use and relevant introductions. A scoring method that drives repeated low-value activity can produce a lively chart without improving customer experience. Recognition should support the professional purpose of Tap Tap Go, with programme rules determining qualification and any benefits.

Imagine this

Hypothetical programme scene

Hypothetically, a 20-person team records 200 eligible actions while a five-person team records 75. Totals are 200 versus 75; per-person averages are ten versus 15. Neither comparison is inherently the correct winner. The programme needs to say which objective its ranking represents.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.